U.N. workers in many parts of the world administering forced vaccinations face opposition from the public. A health worker gives a polio vaccine to a child in Peshawar, Pakistan with armed military participating. Photograph: Mohammad Sajjad/AP

Health Impact News Editor Comments

The controversy surrounding mandatory vaccines seldom is debated on science or merit. Government training materials written to persuade the public to accept mandatory vaccines rely on persuasion and even intimidation, and not facts or science.

Health Impact News has previously reported how the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) and other government health officials have tried to silence the media in publishing anything contrary to their controlled information regarding vaccines, and have produced training documents for health workers to combat those opposed to mandatory vaccinations.

Vaccine injury data is seldom, if ever, published, and the statistics on vaccine injuries and deaths are purposely withheld from public information. (See: U.S. Government Withholds Vaccine Injury Data: Rolls Out “Vaccine Confidence Plan” Instead.) Health Impact News might be the only news source currently publishing the quarterly reports of vaccine injuries and deaths published by the Department of Justice awarded to victims in the government vaccine court.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, when lecturing on vaccine safety, often references a slide presentation from Dr. Jacobson of the Mayo Clinic. It is a slide presentation developed to train doctors on how to deal with patient objectives to vaccines. You can view the entire slide presentation here. Here are a couple of the slides from the presentation:

Jefferey Jaxen has published something similar obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO), which is the agency responsible for world-wide sales of vaccines and distribution, particularly in poorer countries.

WHO MANUAL DIRECTING “AUTHORITIES” ON HOW TO RESPOND TO VACCINE DENIERS IN PUBLIC

by Jefferey Jaxen
Health Impact News

The endlessly increasing vaccine push on the public, at the behest of pharmaceutical companies, can be looked at as nothing more than a psychological operation (PSYOP).

From the European Regional Office of the World Health Organization (WHO) comes the 2016 “Best Practice Guidance 1st Edition: How to Respond to Vocal Vaccine Deniers in Public“.

From this guide parents and communities will understand how to see through the simplistic messaging maneuvers and counter the ongoing public PSYOP. The WHO’s guiding document opens on page one with the following statement:

“This guidance document provides basic broad principles for a spokesperson of any health authority on how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers.The suggestions are based on psychological research on persuasion, on research in public health, communication studies and on WHO risk
communication guidelines.“

The document centers on how to address “science denialism” for health authorities in a public venue or discussion. The document reads like a marijuana propaganda piece from the 1960’s.

According the the WHO, those who question “science” and “experts” are chopped up into three categories: a vaccine refuser, a vaccine skeptic or a vaccine denier. Each one of the three labels, according to the WHO, can be found on what they call the vaccine “hesitancy continuum.”

The “vaccine denier” refers to “a member of a subgroup at the extreme end of the hesitancy continuum.”

When it comes to corporate bottom lines, the pharmaceutical company lobbyist focuses on the politician or government “official” that can persuade the most people, and maneuver around or through the stop-gap measures to remove medical and health freedom.

To these ends, the WHO has created a graphic to address the “probability to change one’s mind to vaccine acceptance.”

The WHO refers to those that don’t believe in vaccines or question their effectiveness and safety “adversaries.”

The document concludes with a chapter titled “How to Protect Yourself.” The chapter warns “In extremely rare circumstances your personal safety and security may be
compromised by your pro-vaccination viewpoint.”

Furthermore, the WHO document cautions the public health official to “Be aware that your evidence and opinion may put your personal safety in jeopardy.”

Overall the document reads like a military PSYOPS manual on how to properly craft and deliver specific messaging to a conquered enemy force. Given the massive amounts of scientific corruption, conspiracy “facts” and political revolving doors with vaccine manufacturers (i.e. Julie “Merck” Gerberding), the WHO’s document is a glimpse to a future where forced medicine, directed by drug manufacturers, will give the public no quarter.

At face value, the instructions and wording are just plain creepy in our current atmosphere of eroding health freedom. Furthermore, it is important to keep in context that just six months before this document’s release, the WHO was caught (in their own internal emails) in a coordinated effort to mislead investigators and fraudulently conceal the dangers of the human papilloma virus vaccine.

Listen to Jefferey Jaxen discuss the WHO vaccine manual on the Robert Scott Bell show:

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.

Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History
by Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk

Free Shipping Available!
Learn More