by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Researchers with The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California have published a study regarding the ineffectiveness of the annual influenza vaccine.

The title of the study is A structural explanation for the low effectiveness of the seasonal influenza H3N2 vaccine.

Each year, the CDC calculates how “effective” they believe the flu shot is based on prevalent strains of influenza in the population compared to strains of viruses used to compose the flu vaccine.

This current study, however, challenges even the belief that if the right strains of influenza are predicted properly, that the flu shot is “effective,” because those viruses contained in the flu shot mutate due to the fact that they are cultured in chicken eggs.

The authors of the study state:

Seasonal influenza vaccine does not always confer protection in vaccinated individuals. Vaccine candidates are selected from clinical isolates based on their antigenic properties.

It is common to use chicken eggs for culturing clinical isolates and for large-scale production of vaccines. However, influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.

It is important to remember that manufacturers of vaccines consider a vaccine to be “effective” if the vaccine can produce “antigens” against the disease the vaccine was developed to supposedly prevent. It does not mean that those who receive the vaccine will never contract the disease for which the vaccine was developed.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny explains this more in detail:

Flu Vaccine Fraud

The lack of science supporting the manufacture and distribution of more than 300 million flu vaccines every year is well-known.

Dr. Cammy Benton from North Carolina recently revealed in an interview with the VAXXED team that the CDC even admitted to her that the science was lacking regarding the effectiveness of the annual flu vaccines.

Story and interview are here.

In the video below, Dr. Mark Geier explains that the flu shot causes Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and that the flu shot is not very effective in preventing the flu.

He also explains that the CDC does not follow the law for vaccines in requiring long-term safety testing for the influenza vaccine like they do with other vaccines, as it is impossible to test a vaccine that changes every year.

So the flu vaccine is basically an experimental vaccine that they want to give out to 300 million people every year. There are also no studies showing the safety of giving the flu vaccine to the same person every single year.

So how can pharmaceutical companies and Government Health Officials get away with breaking the law in regards to the flu vaccine?

It is because U.S. law protects them against any lawsuits regarding vaccine injuries and deaths. See:

The Vaccine Cartel: Largest Criminal Organization in the World – Why Your Flu Shot is Probably Illegal

If you or your children are injured or killed by the flu shot, you have to sue the U.S. Government, at the expense of U.S. taxpayers, NOT pharmaceutical companies, in a special vaccine court. Settlements for injuries and deaths due to the flu vaccine each year are more than all the other vaccines sold in the U.S. combined. See:

Government Issues First Report in 2017 on Vaccine Injuries and Deaths: 275 Injured 4 Dead from Flu Shot.

Your Government Is Lying To You About Flu Deaths

In order to convince people to get a worthless flu vaccine, the mainstream corporate media which is heavily funded by the pharmaceutical industry, along with government health agencies, inflate the dangers of influenza, using fear as a motivation to get the flu shot.

Flu vaccine propaganda often states that 36,000 people a year die from the flu vaccine, but there is no data to back up these numbers. The CDC admits this, stating that it is only an estimate used to get more people vaccinated with the flu vaccine.

See:

CDC Inflates Flu Death Stats to Sell More Flu Vaccines

CDC Caught Red-Handed Exaggerating Flu Cases and Deaths to Increase Vaccine Sales

Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Dr. Suzanne Humphries recently reported how the NHS in the UK is scaring the public by stating that “1 in 11 pregnant women who get flu die.”

Watch their interview here.

Just as Dr. Cammy Benton stated in her recent interview, when one does their own research and looks at the evidence, the risk of injury and death from the flu vaccine is not worth any advertised benefit – because there really is none.

Order Here!

Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.

In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.

One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.