Vaccine in vial with syringe. Vaccination concept.  3d


ACP Given Over $1 Million by CDC to Push Adult Immunization, Implement Tracking Database

by Jefferey Jaxon
Health Impact News

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) own statistics, the seasonal flu vaccine for the 2014-2015 season was only 19 percent effective. So why is there a worldwide push for flu vaccination? What are the risks inherent in a flu vaccination and are they worth it? These questions have been deleted, ignored, omitted, and crossed out by most in favor of what appears to be a dose of drug company profit mixed with political agenda.

There is a full court press on many levels to usher in a new medical model with an ever-increasing vaccine schedule at its core. Vaccine profits are being maximized by drug manufacturers who are absolved of all financial and legal repercussions as they are cradled tight by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. As vaccine mandates are attempting to become law, doctors, nurses, educators, and organizations are being hit with vaccine propaganda to transform their organizations into foot soldiers to carry out unethical and unlawful orders in your community.

Physicians: You Are the Vaccine Fraud Tipping Point

The American College of Physicians (ACP) has recently been awarded with a $1,002,884 Cooperative Agreement by the CDC to focus on increasing vaccination rates in adults. According to the press release:

The [ACP’s] initiate will aim to reach the federal government’s 2020 immunization goals, which includes reaching an 80% to 90% rate of seasonal influenza vaccination among adults (the current rate is 42%).

How does the ACP intend on reaching this goal? According to Wayne J. Riley, ACP president:

ACP supports eliminating existing exemptions, except for medical reasons, from immunization laws.

This funding comes a year after the ACP publicly announced in 2014 they were collaborating with Pfizer and CECity to again, increase adult immunization rates. Pfizer and ACP’s stated agenda at that time was to:

call on all health care providers to assess vaccine status at each visit, strongly recommend vaccinations to patients, administer or refer for immunization, and document vaccination.

CECity was brought on board to implement the cloud-based Adult Immunization Registry called for in the federal government’s 2020 immunization goals.

Taking in all the available information, the ACP “supports eliminating existing exemptions,” is currently working to activate a cloud-based adult immunization registry, is encouraging healthcare providers to “strongly recommend” and “document vaccination” during patient interaction and is aiming towards a 80-90% flu vaccination rate.

An unfavorable vision of the near future begins to appear as this understanding is connected with the recent findings surrounding Senate Bill 277’s implementation. It was recently reported that legal divisions representing California school districts are advising their directors and superintendents to report unvaccinated children to Child Protective Services or obtain a court order to vaccinate as potential solutions as of SB277’s official July 1st, 2016 start date.

False Flu Statistics Justifying Known Toxic Dangers

Anyone who has been around drug company propaganda, especially regarding their vaccines, has seen their share of omitted data, false statements, adjusted numbers, major lawsuits, and just plain lies. As recently highlighted by investigative journalist Jon Rappoport, when tracking incidence of seasonal flu deaths, it is important to understand that the CDC combines both flu and pneumonia deaths into one category. This combined category leads to falsely inflated statistics of seasonal flu fatalities to which the drug manufacturers, politicians, and health care providers parrot eagerly to justify their flu vaccine mandates.

Here are some cold hard facts that should frame the current push to vaccinate for the 2015-2016 flu season:

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”


Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?


One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.