The right of every American to question and criticize their government is enshrined in the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment. Prohibiting dissenting views on any government institution or practice is strictly unconstitutional. However, for the past few years many people have voiced concern about Big Tech platforms censoring dissenting views against the government, and the most common argument used by Big Tech is that they are simply a private platform that allows people to voice their views, and that the First Amendment does not apply to private corporations. But now emails between the CDC and Google, Facebook, and Twitter have surfaced that suggest that the U.S. Government is, indeed, censoring dissenting views by influencing these Big Tech platforms, specifically in regards to the COVID-19 vaccines. Given how deadly these experimental vaccines have been, this is a very serious matter, and I would expect more lawsuits filed in the weeks and months ahead for what appears to be a gross violation of the First Amendment and the right of American citizens to criticize and question their government, especially in regards to medical and health issues.
Quiz: If an agency of the federal government revealed they had no basis for constructing a diagnostic test that was used on millions of people; but the test was the cornerstone of a national lockdown; and the lockdown drove the economy off a cliff; and destroyed millions of lives; however, NOW, that agency says, they DO have a basis for the test; would you buy what they’re selling? If your answer is yes, you’re in good company; the company I call Blind, Ignorant, Denialist, Hoaxing Journalists.
Three prior posts explained how the FDA seeks to delay for 75+ years full production of Pfizer’s pre-licensure safety data. While we have that fight, we submitted a request to the CDC, on behalf of ICAN, for the deidentified post-licensure safety data for the Covid-19 vaccines in the CDC’s v-safe system. Even though this data is available in deidentified form (meaning, it includes no personal health information), the CDC refused to produce this data claiming it is not deidentified. So, on behalf of ICAN, we filed a federal lawsuit against the CDC and its parent entity, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), to force the CDC to produce this data to the public. The CDC should have no issue doing so because it has already made this data available to a private company – Oracle – in deidentified form. It is telling that Larry Ellison’s company can see the data American taxpayers paid the CDC to collect but the average American and independent scientists cannot?!
The CDC Caught in their Own Lies: The Unvaccinated in the U.S. for COVID-19 is “Millions” More than Originally Reported
For almost a year now I have been stating that the CDC has been lying to the public about the COVID-19 shots, using their own data from VAERS to prove it. Now the corporate media is reporting the same thing: the CDC's statistics on COVID-19 "vaccines," in this case the total amount of people in the U.S. who are "vaccinated" with a COVID-19 shot, have been overstated by "millions." Yahoo News reports: "The U.S. government has overcounted the number of Americans who are at least partly vaccinated against the coronavirus, Bloomberg reports. Why it matters: Millions more people than initially thought are unprotected as coronavirus infections, hospitalizations and deaths are rising across the country. Three states — Illinois, Pennsylvania and West Virginia — found enough over-counting of first shots to indicate millions of unvaccinated people had mistakenly been counted as having received a dose." What's especially interesting is that the corporate news report quoted two state officials who admitted that the data from the CDC was worthless. James Garrow, a spokesperson for the Philadelphia Department of Public Health, which has worked with the state to blend data sets for a more accurate view of vaccination trends, said "we don’t have any faith in the numbers on the CDC website, and we never refer to them." “The truth is, we have no idea,” said Clay Marsh, West Virginia’s Covid czar. This news comes out the day following a report published by The Exposé that the UK Government was lying about the number of unvaccinated and that instead of 5 million unvaccinated in the UK, they now admit that it is 23.5 million who have refused the jab, over 40% of their population. This cannot all be a "coincidence," so we need to ask the question: Why are they suddenly admitting this?
CDC Admits COVID-19 Shots Causing Heart Disease but Won’t Stop the Injections – Does Pfizer Now Control the CDC and FDA?
The United States CDC updated their "Adverse Events" page on COVID-19 shots today where they admit that there are now 1,908 reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 shots among young people below the age of 30. This compares to, on the same page, 57 cases of "Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS)" and 278 cases of "Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)" for all age groups, not just those under the age of 30. As we have reported in the past, the CDC typically uses "selective bias" when reporting these "adverse events" to make the numbers look much lower than they actually are. But with the cases of heart disease now skyrocketing, even with their selective bias it can be clearly seen that we are dealing with a very high number of these injuries showing that their assertion that these side effects of heart disease are "rare" is completely absurd. When we include all the other cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in their own data within VAERS for young people under the age of 30, the number is actually 3,262 cases. When we remove the age limit of 30 years old, the cases of carditis skyrocket up to 12,855 cases. For another comparison, and again using THEIR DATA from VAERS, if we look at cases of heart disease following all non-COVID vaccines, which include the flu shots, all the childhood vaccines in the CDC schedule, and every other non-COVID vaccine currently being distributed in the U.S. for the same time period (since last December when the COVID-19 shots were given emergency use authorization), we find 125 cases. 12,855 cases of heart disease following COVID-19 experimental shots for the past year, compared to 125 cases of heart disease following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past year. And the CDC calls this "rare"? This is the government data from the CDC and FDA, and it is under-reported, according to experts, by a factor of between 20X to 41X or more. Why are these shots still on the market killing and crippling people with heart disease? There can only be one explanation. Pfizer now controls the FDA and CDC, and I would go so far as to say they control the United States, including deciding who gets elected to approve their products.
2,809 Dead Babies in VAERS Following COVID Shots as New Documents Prove Pfizer, the FDA, and the CDC Knew the Shots Were Not Safe for Pregnant Women
The latest data dump into the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) happened yesterday (12/3/21) and covers data through 11/26/2021. There are now 927,740 cases reported to VAERS following COVID-19 shots for the past 11 months, out of the total of 1,782,453 cases in the entire VAERS database filed for the past 30+ years. In addition, we found 2,809 fetal deaths following COVID-19 shots injected into pregnant and child-bearing women for the past 11 months. By way of contrast, using the exact same search parameters in VAERS, but excluding the COVID-19 shots, we found 2,168 fetal deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past 30+ years. That’s an average of 72 fetal deaths per year following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past 30+ years, compared to what is on pace to be 3064 fetal deaths in 1 year following COVID-19 shots. That is an 80% increase in fetal deaths recorded in VAERS following the COVID-19 shots. And yet, the CDC and FDA continue to recommend these EUA shots for pregnant women and nursing mothers. Not only do they recommend these shots for pregnant women, we now have ample evidence that they have known since earlier this year that these shots are dangerous to pregnant women, and causing fetal deaths. This article will link to publicly available data that shows the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer have known from early on that these shots cause fetal deaths. With all the links to the publicly available data supplied in this article, there is more than enough information to immediately issue arrest warrants for Rochelle Walensky, the director of the CDC, Janet Woodcock, the FDA director, and Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, for mass murder and crimes against humanity.
1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots but Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get the Shot
The CDC released more data today into VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) which shows that there are now 1,969 fetal deaths among pregnant women who received a COVID-19 shot. By way of contrast, I performed the exact same search in VAERS for all non-COVID-19 vaccines for the past 30 years, and it returned a result of 2,183 fetal deaths from pregnant women following vaccination for the past 30 years. So there have been nearly the same amount of fetal deaths following COVID-19 shots during the past 10 months, as there have been for the past 30+ years that VAERS has been in existence! And how has the CDC responded to this data? This past week the CDC published recommendations for all pregnant women to get a COVID-19 shot! Wake up people!! We are watching a eugenic plan of controlling the world's population unfold before our very eyes, and it is pure insanity for any pregnant woman to voluntarily agree to get a COVID-19 shot that will risk her life, and the life of her unborn baby. Rochelle Walensky and her cohorts at the CDC, along with the criminals at the FDA, NIH, and many other government health organizations need to be arrested immediately to stop this attack against the citizens of the United States with experimental gene therapy injections.
CDC’s Own Stats Show 1,270 Premature Fetal Deaths Following COVID Shots but Recommend Pregnant Women Get COVID Injections
The U.S. CDC announced today that they have "new data" that they claim shows that the COVID-19 experimental injections are now safe for pregnant women. Of course they have been recommending all along that pregnant women get the experimental injections, so it appears that this is just a new marketing strategy to get more pregnant women to get the shots. A search of the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) lists 1,270 premature fetal deaths in pregnant women following one of the experimental, non-FDA approved COVID-19 injections. The CDC admits that this "new study" of nearly 2,500 pregnant women who received an mRNA COVID-19 injection before 20 weeks of pregnancy had 13% of them suffer miscarriages. They concluded that: "The known severe risks of COVID-19 during pregnancy demonstrate that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant people outweigh any known or potential risks." But what exactly are these "benefits" of receiving a COVID-19 "vaccine" that "outweigh the risks?" They admit they don't stop transmission, they admit you can still get COVID-19 after being vaccinated, and they admit that people who are fully vaccinated are still dying. The CDC protects the pharmaceutical industry. They get caught lying all the time. They are not your friend, they don't care about your health, and they don't care if your unborn baby lives or dies.
CDC Begins Mass Extermination Program of Americans’ Children Aged 12 to 17 Implementing Eugenic Population Control Measures through COVID-19 Bioweapons
Rochelle Walensky, the current director of the criminal organization and marketing arm of the pharmaceutical industry, the CDC, which should be renamed more appropriately as the Center for DEATH and population Control, has committed crimes against humanity by heading up a program to kill, maim, and render infertile Americans' children between the ages of 12 and 17. In spite of the overwhelming evidence that this age group has nearly ZERO risk for harm from COVID-19, she addressed the public yesterday and lied to the American people. "In the critical month of June, I want to highlight a specific population that we were hoping will join the tens of millions who have already been vaccinated, and that is adolescents," she explained. She also referenced a report to be published in Friday's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, that demonstrates "the level of severe disease, even among youth that are preventable," which is why the CDC is going to "redouble" motivation to get adolescents and young adults vaccinated. The propaganda report promised yesterday is now up on the CDC website today. Anybody with at least a high school education reading level can clearly see through the BS in this "study" which is nothing more than propaganda. But how many parents will even bother reading this garbage before deciding to let someone inject their child with a COVID-19 bioweapon? We are seeing a global eugenics population reduction plan being unfolded before our very eyes that now far eclipses anything that happened in Nazi Germany during WWII, and is now racing ahead towards numbers that were reported during the Bolshevik revolution under Lenin and Stalin.
The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease. They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change). The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway. Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors: 1. False-postive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value) 2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms. Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.