by Norma Erickson
SaneVax Inc.
Leading pathologist, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, sent an open letter to the President and Premier of China asking for a delay in the scheduled HPV vaccination of Chinese children and young women ages 9-25.
China’s population consists of approximately 143 million females age 9-25 [1]. If human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine manufacturers can convince the Chinese government to vaccinate every woman in this age group with 3 doses of HPV vaccine via a Publicly Funded Program as proposed by two of their paid consultants [2], the revenue generated could amount to over $64 billion USD (using price of HPV vaccines sold in the USA at $150/dose). This staggering amount of money would provide an enormous impact to their bottom line. But the question is at what cost?
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) became one step closer to achieving this when they announced on July 18, 2016 they had successfully persuaded the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) to license Cervarix™ as the first HPV vaccine to help prevent cervical cancer in China. According to the GSK announcement, the commercial launch of Cervarix™ in China is expected in early 2017. (Read the announcement here.)
The imminent implementation of mass HPV vaccination of Chinese children and young women age 9 to 25 has caused grave concerns among many informed citizens in China and abroad. One of those most concerned is Sin Hang Lee, MD, a Chinese American who received his formal medical education and training in China. Dr. Lee has practiced diagnostic cancer pathology in North America for more than 50 years with extensive experience in testing HPV DNA in patient samples and the HPV vaccine Gardasil®
Based on his knowledge of the health impacts of HPV vaccines he has considerable concerns for the female population of China. This prompted Dr. Lee to write an open letter to President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang of The People’s Republic of China, asking them to use their power to delay implementation of any HPV vaccination program in China until the risks versus benefits of mass HPV vaccination of the Chinese children and young women are adequately evaluated by independent medical/scientific experts. Importantly he believes it is essential that these experts are not financially connected to either the manufacturers or other HPV vaccine stakeholders.
In his open letter, Dr. Lee raises following serious science-based concerns about the proposed HPV vaccine program:
- There is zero scientific evidence that HPV vaccines have been proven to prevent a single case of cervical cancer in any country,
- To promote the vaccine, GSK created an unnecessary cervical cancer scare to create a market based on fear and not fact,
- Due to genetic difference, the HPV vaccines which were originally developed and tested in South America may not work across diverse Chinese ethnic populations,
- Long established and low cost cervical screening, not vaccination, is a proven safe and effective means of controlling cervical cancer and as such should be the number one health program, saving billions of dollars and countless lives.
- HPV vaccination offers no added value to existing cervical cancer screening programs,
- Globally there are 10’s of thousands of serious adverse reactions, including deaths, following HPV vaccination, and
- Vaccine manufacturers have inappropriately used their proprietary highly immunogenicity-enhancing aluminum adjuvant as the placebo in all clinical trials and to do in effect masks the risk of HPV vaccines.
The concerns that Dr. Lee has about HPV vaccination apply in other countries, where a number of inquiries are underway as to safety and efficacy and vaccination programs have been halted.
Read Dr. Lee’s original letter here.
Read an executive summary Dr. Lee sent to China here.
References:
[1] Demographics of China 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Population_of_China_by_age_and_sex_.28demographic_pyramid.29
[2] Castle PE, Zhao FH. Population effectiveness, not efficacy, should decide who gets vaccinated against human papillomavirus via publicly funded programs. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:335-7.
Read the full article at SaneVax.org.
Gardasil: The Decision We Will Always Regret
The Gardasil Vaccine After-Life: My Daughter is a Shadow of Her Former Self
Gardasil: An Experience no Child Should Have to Go Through
I Want my Daughter’s Life Back the Way it was Before Gardasil
Gardasil Vaccine: Destroyed and Abandoned
15-Year-Old Vaccinated by Force with Gardasil now Suffers from Paralysis and Pain
Recovering from my Gardasil Vaccine Nightmare
Gardasil: We Thought It Was The Right Choice
“HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child”
13 Year Old World Championship Karate Student Forced to Quit After Gardasil Vaccine
If I Could Turn Back Time, Korey Would not Have Received any Gardasil Shots
What Doctors Don’t Tell You: Our Gardasil Horror Story
Family Fights U.S. Government over Compensation for Gardasil Vaccine Injuries
Gardasil: When Will our Nightmare End?
HPV Vaccine Injuries: “I Cannot Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony”
Gardasil: Don’t Let Your Child Become “One Less”
The Gardasil Vaccine Changed Our Definition of “Normal”
Gardasil: I Should Have Researched First
“They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries
Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed
Gardasil: The Decision I will Always Regret
Gardasil Vaccine: One More Girl Dead
Gardasil: A Parent’s Worst Nightmare
After Gardasil: I Simply Want my Healthy Daughter Back
Gardasil: My Family Suffers with Me
Gardasil Changed my Health, my Life, and Family’s Lives Forever
Gardasil: Ashlie’s Near-Death Experience
Gardasil: My Daughter’s Worst Nightmare
My Personal Battle After the Gardasil Vaccine
Gardasil: The Worst Thing That Ever Happened to Me
A Ruined Life from Gardasil
HPV Vaccines: My Journey Through Gardasil Injuries
The Dark Side of Gardasil – A Nightmare that Became Real
Toddler Wrongly Injected with Gardasil Vaccine Develops Rare Form of Leukaemia
More information about Gardasil
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.
3 Comments