Photo of syringe on a map of Africa, antique style.

Somali Measles Epidemic and The Brady Principle

by Dr. Brownstein’s
Holistic Medicine

Somehow, a measles outbreak of unvaccinated Somali citizens in Minnesota is supposed to drive a stake in those of us who raise questions about the safety and efficacy of FDA-approved vaccines.  According to the powers-that-be, this outbreak of measles is proof that we need more vaccinations, not less.

I beg to differ.  And, I will make my argument citing the Brady principle.  I am sure most adults over the age of 50 are very familiar with the Brady Principle.

For those unfamiliar, let me provide you with the information you will need to understand the Brady Principle.

From 1969-1974, the Brady Bunch ran weekly as a sitcom.  I watched every episode and can still recall most of them.  The Brady Principle refers to the episode where all six Brady kids became ill with the measles.  What happened to the Brady kids?  They stayed home from school, played Monopoly, and Alice cooked for them, and they recovered from the measles infection.

During the episode, Marsha Brady stated, “If you have to get sick, sure can’t beat the measles.” The Brady Principle would indicate that measles is not a dangerous disease for most who become ill from it.  When I was a child, measles was treated as an illness similar to chickenpox; most children became ill with these childhood diseases and most recovered uneventfully.  Back then, measles and chickenpox were not feared illnesses in the U.S.

Back to the Brady’s.  The good news for the Brady kids, and the Somali children, is that they will have life-long immunity from measles.  And, the female Brady children (Marsha, Cindy, and Jan) passed their immunity on to their children so that their newborn children would not become ill if there was a measles outbreak.  However, this is not the case with vaccinated children as the measles vaccine does not provide life-long immunity and it does not provide antibodies to their newborn children to protect them during a vulnerable time in their lives.

The pro-vaccine cartel is screaming that the Somali measles epidemic is an example of why we need more vaccines.

They are wrong.

Yes the measles vaccine is successful at lowering the incidence of measles.  However, this creates a vaccinated population that does not have life-long immunity to a fairly benign illness.  Yes, measles can be associated with severe adverse effects and even death.  So can the measles vaccine.  During the last 10 years, there has been one death from measles, but that patient was an adult woman who was on immunosuppressive medications and had other serious health problems. (1)  I performed a search on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and found that from 2000 to 2017, there were 156 deaths related to the MMR vaccine.

Somali mothers were not too familiar with autism when they came to the U.S.  An article in the Globe and Mall quotes a Somali mother stating, “In Somalia, we had kids with Down syndrome and cerebral palsy. But nobody had ever heard of autism,” Ms. Hassan recalls. “And believe me, it’s not something you can hide.”  In the article, Somalis are calling autism the “western disease” or the “vengeance from abroad.”  (2) Approximately 40 years ago, autism rates in Africa were reported to be much lower than the U.S. (3)

However, things changed quickly for Somali parents when they came here and started raising their children.  The autism rate in Somali children in Minnesota came to the forefront in 2008-2009 when a Minnesota Department of Health study found that Somali preschoolers, when compared to other children, were two to seven times more likely to receive autism services from the Minneapolis school system. (4)

The Somali mothers apparently felt that their children were being affected by the MMR vaccine and began to decline the vaccination.  The Somali mothers should have been concerned about the relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism as this was reported by a senior CDC scientist nearly three years ago. (5)  The CDC scientist has claimed whistleblower status as he has stated, under oath, that the CDC destroyed, hid and falsified data that showed a clear link between the MMR vaccine and autism.  And, the altered CDC data revealed that the most affected group of children were African American boys.

Now you can see why some Somali mothers were concerned and chose not to vaccinate.  What parent would subject their child to a medical procedure knowing that it could cause a life-long neurological injury in order to prevent a relatively benign illness for the vast majority who become ill with it?

Folks, saying vaccines are safe and effective does not make it so.  Repeating this line over and over does not make it so.

There is nothing wrong with questioning vaccine safety.  There is nothing wrong with wanting vaccines to be properly studied for the safety and effectiveness-which has not been done.  And, if a parent decides that their child is not going to be vaccinated, there is nothing wrong with that as well.

There is something wrong when parents are vilified for trying to make the best medical decisions for their children.  In the case of the MMR vaccine, we may have less measles and less measles-associated problems, but we may have other unintended conditions.

Our children are the least healthy when compared to other Western countries.  Our children are the most vaccinated.  Where is the data that more vaccines are going to help them?

It is time to let your Congressperson know your thoughts on these issues. Jason Chaffetz, who chairs the Office of Government Reform has been aware of the CDC whistleblower for nearly three years now.  It is up to him to call a Congressional hearing to investigate the whistleblower’s claims.  Mr. Chaffetz refuses to do so.  I was happy to hear he will not seek reelection as we do not need more Congressmen like Mr. Chaffetz.  We already have enough Congressmen and women who do nothing.

What can you do?  Call the Office of Government Reform (OGR) and demand a hearing on the CDC whistleblower.   The OGR can be reached here:  202.225.5074.  I have been calling on a frequent basis for nearly three years.  I can assure you that the OGR staffers neither like hearing my voice nor do they like speaking with me.   Tell the OGR to call a hearing on the CDC whistleblower after you ask them why they have not acted on this matter before.

Most importantly, email President Trump.  He is knowledgeable about this issue and has the power to push for hearings on vaccine safety.  You can email President Trump here:

Make you views heard. We already have over a million U.S. children with autism.  This is a new phenomenon.   Something is causing this epidemic increase. If it is vaccine related and we do nothing, our Republic may not survive.


Read the full article at



(3)    Childhood autism in Africa. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1978;19(3):231-44



Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.

In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.

One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?


One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.