Study: MMR Vaccine Linked to Type 1 Diabetes

Health Impact News

Bioinformatics analysis links type 1 diabetes to vaccines contaminated with animal proteins and autoreactive T cells express skin homing receptors consistent with injected vaccines as causal agent

Background

Autoimmunity against glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) has been associated with type 1 diabetes. GAD65 (65kDa) and GAD67 (67kDa, to a lesser extent) are involved in type 1 diabetes.

Following an anecdotal report of type 1 diabetes diagnosis a few weeks after measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine administration, MMR vaccine contents were examined. Major proteins in the vaccine apart from the measles, mumps and rubella live viruses were chicken embryo cell culture proteins.

GAD65 and GAD67 are expressed during chicken embryogenesis.

Method

GAD65 Gallus gallus (chicken) protein sequence was obtained from Uniprot.

BLASTP was used to determine homology to human GAD65.

Results

GAD65 protein comparison between human and chicken reveals 95% sequence homology as shown below.

Discussion

The results above provide strong evidence that chicken embryo cell culture proteins in the MMR vaccine can cause the development of antibodies against chicken GAD65 which cross-react with human GAD65 protein to cause type 1 diabetes.

This is very similar to the Pandemrix vaccine causing narcolepsy.

Action

Vaccine design and safety processes have fundamental problems that need to be immediately addressed to avoid such devastating consequences.

Read the full study here.

Order Here!

Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.

In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.

One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.

Read:

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

Published on September 10, 2017

One Comment

Melanie September 11, 2017 at 1:06 pm - Reply

This is very concerning. I highly suspect it will be completely ignored by the CBC, as was Dr Thompson’s confession to altering the MMR study to filter the results of linking MMR to autism especially in black boys vaccinated before 3 years of age. Abosolutely nothing was changed after that admission. It is disgusting that the government agencies that are supposed to protect public health will not acknowledge the problems associated with vaccines. Congress too is to blame for giving the drug companies immunity. Something needs to change. Drug companies need to scrutinized by independent studies that are done for long enough, with true benign placebos (not compared to another vaccine). Even if safer vaccines are developed people should always have a choice. It is their bodies and they are the ones bearing the physical and financial burden when vaccine injury occurs. Of course everyone likes to spout that it was just a coincidence, but when it was within hours, days or even weeks of a vaccine it is highly likely that it was the cause. Not every reaction is instantaneous as in sn allergic reaction. It takes time for the vaccines to disrupt or destroy our bodies and symptoms often are vague at first and accelerate as the body is unable to cope.