Bitchute Telegram Feed

Central Bank Digital Currencies – A Future of Surveillance and Control

One of the most potentially far-reaching trends in the financial landscape right now is the imminent roll-out of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and the parallel attacks which central bankers are waging on private digital currencies and tokens as they tee up the launch of their CBDCs. First some clarifications. While the majority of central bank issued currencies (fiat currencies) in existence around the world are already in digital form, a fiat currency held in digital form is not the same as a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). A CBDC generally refers to electronic or virtual central bank (fiat) money that is created in the form of digital tokens or account balances which are digital claims on the central bank. CBDCs will be issued by central banks and will be legal tender. CBDCs are not just a buzzword or a hazy innovation that may appear sometime in the distant future. They are actively being developed now, and in widespread fashion. 5 central banks have already launched a CBDC, 14 have a CBDC in pilot, 16 have a CBDC in development, and another 32 central banks are at the research stage with their CBDC. That makes 67 central banks (countries in total). Although central banks will claim that they are introducing CBDCs for reasons such as improving payments efficiency, boosting financial inclusion for the unbanked and tackling illicit transactions, their real motivations, as always, are for surveillance and control. Surveillance of a population via complete visibility into financial transaction flow and user identities, and centralized control of the money supply within a cashless financial system. Think China’s social credit system on a global dystopian scale, where vax passes evolve into digital IDs and digital IDs link to CBDC issuance and use. In fact, the entire coercion around implementing vaccine passports and digital IDs looks to be a pre-planned stepping stone for the roll-out of central bank digital currencies and global social credit systems.

Read More

Top Tennis Player Forced to Stop Competing Due to COVID-19 Shot Side Effects – Other Top Tennis Stars Say “No” to Shots

Former 2017 Davis Cup winner tennis player Jeremy Chardy recently announced he could no longer compete in professional tennis this year due to the crippling effects of the Pfizer COVID-19 shot. "Suddenly I cannot train, I cannot play. In my head, it's difficult because I do not know how long it will last. For the moment, my season is stopped and I do not know when I will resume. It's frustrating because I started the year really well, I was playing really well. And then I went to the Games, where I felt great too. And now my season is at a standstill and I do not know when I will resume. It is especially frustrating that I do not have ten years to play... suddenly, now I regret having had the vaccine." Unlike other professional sports leagues that claim a high percentage of its players are now fully vaccinated with a COVID-19 shot, professional tennis has only about a 50% rate of those who have taken the shot, and some of the sport's top players have said they do not intend to take it. The world's top four male players – Novak Djokovic, Daniil Medvedev, Stefanos Tsitsipas and Alexander Zverev – have all spoken at some point about their reluctance to be vaccinated. Coincidentally, three of that rebel quartet were US Open semi-finalists this month, which meant that all but one, Felix Auger-Aliassime, who is still yet to confirm his view, had either raised concerns about the jab or stated they refuse to take it. If mandatory COVID-19 shots are required in the future for these players to compete, how many will risk their health and their lives to continue competing in their sport? I seriously doubt that the Globalists who own these professional sports leagues will allow unvaccinated players to continue competing much longer, because it will soon become obvious who are the better athletes, vaccinated or unvaccinated.

Read More

New Yorkers Rising Up as Mandatory COVID Shot Deadline Looms – Citywide Walk Out Planned Same Day

Many New York City workers are facing a Monday (9/27/21) deadline to be "vaccinated" with a COVID-19 shot as a condition for employment. A citywide "walk out" has been in the plans for the past week on the same day, from 2-6 p.m. starting in Foley Square. Known simply as "JoSpeaksTruth" on Telegram, this woman from the Dominican Republic fired up the crowds in NYC today, stating that: "This is the worst psychological operation in history... Another tactic that is used on the people is fear. A Stockhold Syndrome and cognitive dissonance. The government is abusing us. I need people to realize this: we can no longer continue to go this way. Our jobs are on the line. I personally, I don't care. Because I'd rather stand free, I'd rather eat food from the dumpster, than get injected with this bioweapon! This is an assault on our humanity. And if we don't have control over what we put into our bodies, we're nothing but slaves and cattle." Listen to her whole inspired speech on the streets of New York today. Time to stand up and resist New York! The largest city in the United States with international fame as one of the most ethnically diverse cultural centers found anywhere in the world, this is your time to shine! 

Read More

UK Medicine Regulator Confirms There Have Been Four Times as Many Deaths Due to the Covid-19 Vaccines in 8 Months than Deaths Due to All Other Vaccines Combined in 20 Years

Up to the 15th September 2021 there have been a grand total of 1,662 deaths reported to the MHRA as adverse reactions to all available Covid-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom since the beginning of the year. Meaning there have been four times as many deaths in just 8 months due to the Covid-19 vaccines than there have been due to every other available vaccine since the year 2001, and now they are administering this experimental treatment to children who are at zero risk of even suffering serious disease due to the Covid-19 virus.

Read More

Australia Records 10X More Deaths Following COVID-19 Shots than Recorded Deaths Following ALL Vaccines for Past 20 Years

One of our readers contacted me this week with information that the Australian government collects on vaccine injuries on their Department of Health website. Like many countries, Australia maintains a database of adverse reactions for drugs. The Australian government database for adverse reactions tracks 78 different vaccines for the past 20 years, with a total of 47 deaths following vaccination during the years 2000 through 2020. In 2021 for just the 3 COVID-19 vaccines, there have already been a total of 524 deaths recorded following the COVID-19 shots, more than 10X the total for the past 20 years. And now the Australian government is doing everything they can to lock down the citizens of their country and force them to be injected with one of the COVID-19 shots as a condition for participating in society.

Read More

Genocide of Seniors Continues as FDA and CDC Recommend 3rd Booster Shot to Age Group with Highest Amount of Deaths following COVID-19 Shots

Last Friday an FDA vaccine advisory committee voted 16 to 2 against authorizing a 3rd Pfizer COVID-19 "booster" shot. And yet inexplicably, they later took a second vote among the same committee members to authorize a 3rd Pfizer booster shot for people over the age of 65, which was passed unanimously. The vast majority of recorded deaths in VAERS following the current COVID-19 injections is among people over the age of 65. According to statistics in the VAERS government database, which was just updated today, 77% of all deaths following COVID-19 shots are among people over the age of 65. That brings the total amount of deaths in people over the age of 65 following a COVID-19 shot to 11,770 deaths. Throughout this week we have published whistleblower testimonies stating that tremendous pressure is put on healthcare workers to NOT report adverse reactions to VAERS, and we also now have Dr. Jessica Rose's very detailed analysis on the underreporting of adverse reactions in VAERS where she concludes that a safe estimate would be to multiply adverse events by a factor of 41X. That would mean then that a conservative estimate of deaths in people over the age of 65 following a COVID-19 shot is 482,570 senior deaths. Did you think I was exaggerating when I chose to use the word "genocide" for this age group in the headline to this article? By way of comparison, I searched the government VAERS database for deaths in this age group following ALL vaccines for the past 30 years, since VAERS was started, and it returned a result of 1,311 deaths in people above the age of 65 following ALL non-COVID vaccines for the past 30 years. So we have seen almost ten times more deaths in this age group following COVID-19 shots during the past 9 months than the past 30 years following all other vaccines. And for those people in this age group who survived the first two doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 shot, the FDA and the CDC just authorized a third shot to be given to this age group with the highest recorded deaths already following COVID-19 shots. Euthanizing our seniors through vaccination is mass murder, and these mass murderers allowing this to happen need to be executed over this.

Read More

Mockers of Anti-Vaxxers Continue to Die After Taking a COVID-19 Injection

We live in a world today where "truth" is evaluated by many based on what they read on social media, and how many people "like" or agree with their positions. In the real world, however, truth is independent of how many people agree or disagree about any issue. This is especially true today with the one issue that is polarizing the world right now: COVID-19 "vaccinations." If someone believes that the COVID-19 shots are beneficial and necessary for everyone to take to return to "normal," having 99% of your friends, family, and the health authorities like Anthony Fauci, the FDA, and the CDC agree with you regarding this "truth" really doesn't matter, as their opinions on the subject do not affect the truth. And here is the truth: those who take a COVID-19 shot risk death and life-long disabilities and disease as a side effect from the shots. Those who do not take COVID-19 injections have ZERO risk of dying or being injured from them. That is the actual truth, but even when pro-vaccine people who mock anti-vaxxers end up dying shortly after taking a COVID-19 shot, their family and friends in most cases will never blame the shot, but continue on with their religious-like belief in the vaccines. And some now are actually blaming the unvaccinated for the deaths of the vaccinated! 

Read More

COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries and Deaths COVER-UP! Nurse Whistleblowers Reveal How They are Pressured to NOT Report Deaths and Injuries to VAERS

As we have previously reported here at Health Impact News, the government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) now lists twice as many deaths following COVID-19 shots for the past 9 months as deaths following ALL vaccines for the past 30 years! Not only is this information from the government's own database NOT being reported in the pharma-funded corporate media, but nurses and other frontline workers are now coming forward to report that very few deaths and injuries from the COVID-19 shots are actually being reported to VAERS due to tremendous pressure by the pro-vaccine crowd to NOT report them. Their voices are being censored by the corporate media. Here is a video report we have compiled of nurse whistleblowers (including a physician's assistant's testimony) explaining just how difficult it is for anyone to actually file a report for COVID-19 vaccine injuries and deaths. So what are the REAL numbers of those already dead or permanently injured from the COVID-19 shots?

Read More

U.S. Army Uses “7 Tenets of Satanism” to Promote Mandatory COVID-19 Shots

Tucker Carlson of Fox News exposes a PowerPoint presentation that the military is using to convince soldiers to get the mandatory COVID-19 shots that uses the "7 Tenets of Satanism." The U.S. Army allegedly confirmed that this is real.

Read More

Pulmonary Nurse of 31 Years Testifies How he Unknowingly Killed Patients by Following COVID Protocols

Albert Spence is a pulmonary nurse with 31 years of experience. He recently gave public testimony before the South Carolina State Legislature on "therapeutic options" for COVID-19. Once again, we are finding that nurses who have been working on the frontlines treating COVID-19 patients are the most informed people in the U.S. right now who truly know what is going on in the hospitals, especially when it comes to COVID-19 protocols, and the experimental COVID-19 "vaccines." We absolutely need to be listening to these frontline workers right now instead of the talking head "doctors" on TV who never actually treat patients, if we truly want to know what the truth is. Wall Street and the pharmaceutical industry now control the corporate media, and they will never publish testimonies like this, even though it is public knowledge now having been recorded by the South Carolina legislature.  In this public testimony, Mr. Spence relates how he followed all the advice in the beginning of how the medical system wanted him to treat COVID patients, even though so much of it went against his 30+ years of experience in treating patients with respiratory illnesses. But when the COVID patients started dwindling down in his ward at the beginning of this year, and he found out that the CDC had changed the threshold for PCR tests by reducing the tests from 40 cycles to 28, then he realized what was happening, and it horrified him. He had been unwittingly assisting in killing his patients by just "doing what I was told." He now knows that these patients were dying from the COVID protocols, and not COVID-19.

Read More