On Oct. 7, 2020, during a hastily scheduled virtual meeting, four District of Columbia Council members making up the Health Committee amended and unanimously passed a minor consent bill, B23-0171.3 The bill would not only permit children aged 11 years and older to give consent for doctors and other vaccine administrators to give them vaccines without their parents’ knowledge or consent, but would also require insurance companies, vaccine administrators and schools to conceal from parents that the child has been vaccinated. On Oct. 20, 2020,4 the entire DC Council voted in favor of the bill 12:15 on the first reading in yet another virtual online meeting with no public testimony. It was announced that the second reading, which will be the final vote, will take place on Nov. 10, 2020. In a revealing statement Vincent C. Gray (D-Ward 7), the chair of the DC Health Committee which passed the bill, explained why the bill was all suddenly being revived and pushed through so quickly. Gray was quoted in The Washington Post as saying, “the hope of an imminent coronavirus vaccine gave the bill new urgency.” Primary sponsor of this bill, DC Council Member Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3), emphasized that coronavirus vaccines were her the main reason why she wants to remove parents from the process of vaccinating children.
America, we need to have a conversation. It is a very serious and dire conversation that has been intentionally ignored and swept under the rug for far too long. It concerns a dialogue that our entire mainstream media, in its conventional blindness, refuses to acknowledge. Yet its consequences are potentially severe and perhaps deadly. It may not eventually have an impact upon you personally nor your health, but it will surely have a profound adverse effect upon someone you know or perhaps even a loved one. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is no nickel-dime physician. He has practiced medicine for five decades, was a post-doctoral researcher at one of the world’s most prestigious research institutes, the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, and later held the Microbiology Chair at the University of Mainz in Germany for a dozen years. He has impeccable credentials that in our opinion outweigh many of our so-called medical experts preaching from their official soapboxes. Dr. Bhakdi is not anti-vaccine, however he is deeply worried about the new technologies for a Covid-19 vaccine being rushed to market. One of the greatest fears being heard over the internet is that these new gene-based vaccines will recombine with our body’s DNA and cause untold health problems. But this worries Bhakdi less than other far greater risks with life-long debilitating consequences. Each of us should be deeply concerned about the above potential adverse effects from a Covid-19 vaccine. Vaccination policy is supposed to be based upon concise benefit-risk analyses. Sadly, this has never been a firm policy implemented in the US and it has been a factor largely denied by the majority of the medical community. Every vaccination is a game of Russian roulette. The real denialists are those in the mainstream media who are too lazy, biased or lack a moral conscience to perform proper due diligence and mine the scientific literature for answers. Do yourself a favor. Simply don’t listen to them. And when Gates, Fauci, Trump, Biden or any state governor begin talking about the “awesome” promises of a Covid-19 vaccine or its mandate, turn off your television or computer screen. These people are only the profiteers protecting the vaccine makers and in the event of vaccine injuries we are just collateral damage in the "War Against Corona."
Four Decades of Deceit and Covering Up Vaccine Injuries and Deaths Leads to Mistrust of American Public Regarding Experimental COVID Vaccine
This year, the orchestrated actions by governments around the world to restrict or eliminate civil liberties in response to the emergence of a new coronavirus has been unprecedented, and it has had profound effects on the global economy and on the physical, mental and emotional health of billions of people. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the overall mortality rate for the new SARS coronavirus causing COVID-19 is about 0.6 percent, although some scientists say it is lower, 6 while others estimate it can be as high as one to two percent in some parts of the world. Compared to Ebola with a 50 percent mortality rate 8or smallpox, at 30 percent; 9 tuberculosis at 20 to 70 percent; 10 diphtheria at 5 to 10 percent; 11 or the 1918 influenza pandemic with a 2.5 percent mortality rate, 12 COVID-19 is near the bottom of the infectious diseases mortality scale with a less one percent mortality rate in most countries. Those at highest risk for complications and death include the elderly and those with one or more poor health conditions. The CDC recently reported that only six percent of COVID-19-related deaths were solely due to coronavirus infection and 94 percent of the people who died also had influenza or pneumonia; heart, lung or kidney disease; high blood pressure; diabetes, or another underlying poor health condition. Most studies suggest it is rare for children to suffer complications and die from COVID-19. But seven months after the World Health Organization 16 declared a coronavirus pandemic, and public health officials persuaded lawmakers to turn the world upside down, a lot of people are asking questions and so are doctors who disagree with each other about the facts. Doctors and public health officials wondering why people don’t trust what they say about infectious diseases and vaccination, including coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines, only have to look in the mirror to answer the question. Since 1982, parents of vaccine injured children have been begging doctors to do the kind of science that will explain why so many highly vaccinated children, who don’t get measles or chicken pox anymore, are stuck on sick and suffering with brain and autoimmune disorders that never go away. For four decades we have been asking doctors and government health officials to stop sweeping casualties of inhumane one-size-fits all vaccine policies under the rug. What we get from medical professors in universities receiving lots of money from the government and pharmaceutical companies, and from doctors developing vaccines, and from public health officials pushing “no exceptions” vaccination policies is threats, name-calling, bullying and punishment if we try to exercise informed consent to vaccination. There is no other word for it but abuse.
COVID Vaccine Manufacturers Given Legal Immunity for Injuries or Deaths Caused by Fast-tracked Vaccines
In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States and other countries around the globe have opened the door for accelerated development, testing and fast track licensure of experimental COVID-19 vaccines. The question many people have is: who will assume product liability when COVID-19 vaccines cause harm to an individual who has been vaccinated? AstraZeneca plc, a multinational pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Cambridge, England, has been granted product liability protection for the COVID-19 vaccine the company is developing by most countries with which it has made vaccine supply agreements. Liability questions have been a central issue in negotiations between AstraZeneca and countries seeking COVID-19 vaccine supply contracts. In the U.S., vaccine manufacturers are shielded from liability under the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act if a vaccine or drug developed in response to a health emergency like a pandemic causes the death or permanent injury of an individual who receives it during pre-licensure clinical trials or after it is released for public use. The PREP Act was part of a series of “Bioshield” laws created in response to national security fears after 9/11 and subsequent reported weaponized microbe threats, which prompted Congress to encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop anti-bioterrorism vaccines by, in part, eliminating liability for injuries and deaths caused by those vaccines.
The World Health Organization (WHO) announced today their plan to vaccinate every person on the planet with a COVID-19 vaccine. In order to do this, they have received $18 BILLION from two organizations funded by Bill Gates: GAVI and the Vaccine Alliance and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). It is hard to keep track how much money the U.S. Government has given Big Pharma companies to develop a COVID vaccine, but I believe it is still less than $5 BILLION. That means Bill Gates has just outspent the U.S. Government for COVID vaccine development by about 3 to 1.
The pharmaceutical industry's marketing trade publication, FiercePharma, published an article this week where analysts predicted that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration could approve "at least one" new COVID 19 vaccine before the November elections. FDA chief Stephen Hahn, however, testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee yesterday (June 23, 2020), and stated that the FDA was breaking from the White House's "Warp Speed" timeline for vaccine development, stating that "data and science" would drive the agency's decision making. Hahn was responding to a Congressional inquiry, with a letter being sent to him by three chairs from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform who were concerned about the safety of a "fast-tracked" vaccine. This begs the question, considering that more than $1 TRILLION has already been spent by the U.S. Government to develop COVID vaccines, who is calling the shots here on the COVID vaccine? President Trump has publicly endorsed the "Operation Warp Speed" COVID vaccine project, which is run by a military general and medical authorities all with ties to Bill Gates. Stephen Hahn is President Trump's hand-picked man to run the FDA, coming out of a career in cancer research in Texas. So as America and the world look to the future and a possible COVID vaccine that some doctors claim will be a new kind of DNA vaccine never before used on humans that could have devastating results with many lives lost or destroyed, will the FDA really be transparent with test results and only rely on "data and science?" Because if so, such a vaccine would probably be years away, and certainly not within this year. And if the FDA does, in fact, take this position, will President Trump, as the commentary in FiercePharma states, "push the FDA behind the scenes to issue an approval or emergency authorization"? I guess it depends on who is calling the shots. Will the President and the FDA, or Bill Gates and his collaborators in the U.S. Government such as Dr. Fauci, Dr. Deborah Birx, CDC Director Robert Redfield, and now Operation Warp Speed Director Dr. Moncef Slaoui, be the ones to make the decision to further advance their goals of reducing the world's population? In fact, I think it is appropriate to ask the question: Is the decision to approve this COVID vaccine a requirement for someone to be elected as President of the United States in November?
Pharmaceutical companies racing to fast-track a COVID vaccine are already warning the public that any vaccine that comes into the market will probably only offer temporary "protection," laying the ground work for a COVID vaccine that will probably be similar to the annual flu vaccine, where a new shot is needed every year. The flu vaccine is already the most dangerous vaccine in the market, comprising the bulk of settlements for injuries and deaths in the U.S. Vaccine Court. FiercePharma, the marketing trade publication for the vaccine industry, quoted AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot from an interview he gave on a Belgian radio station: “We think that it will protect for about a year.” FiercePharma also reports that AstraZeneca expects to have their vaccine ready by October this year. Soriot said that “if all goes well, we will have the results of the clinical trials in August/September,” as quoted by Reuters. “We are manufacturing in parallel,” he added. “We will be ready to deliver from October if all goes well.” Soriot is not the only one saying that multiple shots will be needed for COVID treatment. Dr. Fauci has said the same thing, as Marco Cáceres reports in this article from The Vaccine Reaction.
Editors of The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine: Pharmaceutical Companies are so Financially Powerful They Pressure us to Accept Papers
Philippe Douste-Blazy, MD, is a cardiologist and former French Health Minister who served as Under-Secretary General of the United Nations. He was a candidate in 2017 for Director of the World Health Organization. In a videotaped interview on May 24, 2020, Dr. Douste-Blazy provided insight into how a series of negative hydroxychloroquine studies got published in prestigious medical journals. He revealed that at a recent Chatham House top secret, closed door meeting attended by experts only, the editors of both, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine expressed their exasperation citing the pressures put on them by pharmaceutical companies. He states that each of the editors used the word “criminal” to describe the erosion of science. He quotes Dr. Richard Horton who bemoaned the current state of science: “If this continues, we are not going to be able to publish any more clinical research data because pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful; they are able to pressure us to accept papers that are apparently methodologically perfect, but their conclusion is what pharmaceutical companies want.”
As millions of Americans remain out of work, and small businesses continue to face insurmountable odds to reopen as many are being damaged and looted in cities all across the U.S., the government continues to pour BILLIONS of dollars into the pharmaceutical industry in what is probably the largest transfer of wealth seen in the U.S. since World War II. We previously reported on the government's "Warp Speed" project to fast-track a Coronavirus vaccine with unlimited resources of federal funding. Operation Warp Speed is headed by General Gustave Perna, and Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the former chairman of GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccines division. Dr. Slaoui has strong ties to Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and Big Tech, particularly Google. President Trump has previously stated that the U.S. Military would help deploy over 300 million doses of a Coronavirus vaccine later this year. FiercePharma has reported that the Trump Administration narrowed down the finalists among the pharmaceutical companies competing to develop the Coronavirus vaccine to: AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson and Moderna. British drugmaker AstraZeneca, in addition to securing $1.2 billion from the U.S. Government for their Coronavirus vaccine, just also received $750 million from the Bill Gates funded Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, which work together with the World Health Organization to distribute vaccines worldwide, particularly the poorer countries. So it looks pretty clear at this point, that Phase 3 of the Plandemic is to inoculate the entire world's population with a COVID-19 vaccine. If this ends up being a new mRNA-based vaccine never before seen in the market, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Dr. Judy Mikovits are predicting 50 million deaths and untold injuries just within the United States.
COVID Experimental Vaccine Victim Claims “Sickest in His Life” after Being Injected with Experimental Vaccine
You know Ian Haydon from many appearances on CNN and other networks celebrating his heroic act of volunteering to test Moderna’s experimental COVID vaccine. The sun has now set on Haydon’s television career. He is no longer useful to the Pharmedia narratives that all vaccines are always safe for all people, that Moderna’s business partners, Tony Fauci and Bill Gates, were justified in skipping animal studies and that Moderna’s vaccine will soon rescue us from the Pandemic. Ian Haydon is now an embarrassment to Fauci, Gates, and their CNN cheerleaders. He will therefore vanish into the censorship twilight. Moderna chose Haydon for the study because of his robust good health. He was among the 15 volunteers in the high dose group. Within 45 days, three of these—a shocking 20%—experienced “serious” adverse events according to Moderna’s press release meaning they required hospitalization or medical intervention.