The Western Concept of “Family” is Unknown in the Ancient Biblical Literature

The English word "family" has a very specific, and very narrow meaning in modern English. If someone asks you, for example, "How's your family?", it is generally understood two ways, depending on whether or not you are married and have your own children. It either means you and your spouse, along with any children you have, or it means you and your parents, and any siblings that you have. However, such a concept of "family" only started in 15th Century in Europe, more than 1400 years after the Bible was written. As we can see from the historical uses of the English word "family," its original meaning went far beyond what is today referred to as "the nuclear family" consisting of only parents and their children. Before the "Industrial Age" and the "Age of Enlightenment" and the "Protestant Reformation" in Europe, the term "family" was more broadly understood in terms of location and "estates", and included more than just those with a biological relationship, but also included slaves and other humans who were part of that "estate", or "household" but not necessarily biologically related to each other. Therefore, when you see the English word "family" used to translate certain passages in the New Testament which was written in Koine Greek, you need to understand that the choice of the translators to use "family" is 100% subjective, as there is no underlying Greek word that means "family" in the modern sense. This is easily seen by doing searches in the English Bibles today, where the older English language translations seldom used "family" at all, but the more modern English translations use it quite a bit. For example, in the old "King James Version" (KJV), it is only used once.

Satan Hates Children and Most Americans Agree with Him Whether They Realize it or Not

A news story out of Georgia is causing a national political debate, and this might be the most bizarre news story I have ever seen! A 30-year-old nurse and mother was recently declared "brain dead" after being admitted to the hospital, and she was about nine weeks pregnant. Doctors decided to keep the young woman alive so the baby could grow strong enough to be delivered. The grandmother has now gone public, and stated that while she wants her grandson to live, she is now upset because she was not granted the "right" to choose to abort him, even though doctors told her that aborting the child would have no effect on whether her daughter would live or not. Does this make any sense at all?? How can the life of a precious child become so political?? However, if you incorrectly look at this issue as strictly a "political" issue between Conservatives and Liberals, and make the false claim that ONLY Conservatives are Pro-life, you would be seriously wrong. The "logic" of this grandmother is no different from the "logic" of Conservatives like the Florida Governor and his leaders who say a mother does not have a right to choose an abortion and kill their unborn child, but then at the same time they produce scientific evidence that the COVID-19 shots are killing babies in Florida, but state that it is a "parent's choice" to choose to vaccinate that child which could result in their death, as they refuse to ban the shots just as they have banned abortions.