“Died Unexpectedly” Cases Surge with More Deaths in 2022 than 2020-2021 as People Continue to Get COVID-19 Vaccines

The fact that deaths of previously healthy young people are now exploding around the world is no longer in dispute, as even the corporate media has had to address this tragic phenomenon. The Telegraph reported this week: "Excess deaths in England and Wales are currently running higher than in the main pandemic years of 2020 and 2021, figures have shown. Throughout October, there have been an average of 1,564 extra deaths per week, compared with a weekly average of just 315 in 2020 and 1,322 in 2021." What none of these corporate media sources dare to address, of course, is if these young, formerly healthy people were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines, and what possible role the experimental vaccines could have played in their "unexpected" deaths. The reason for this is undoubtedly because the corporate media today is not an industry that can exist in a free market, and is therefore dependent on sponsors to fund them, and the largest sponsors are from the pharmaceutical industry. To even suggest that the COVID-19 vaccines played any part in these "unexpected" deaths would cause people to stop wanting to receive their vaccine products, and it would also open them up to criminal prosecution. As I have previously reported, here in the U.S. the criminal government agencies that protect the pharmaceutical industry have labeled these deaths Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS), and developed a new term and category to explain the diseases that are crippling those who do not die called "Long COVID." The problem with using "Long COVID" as the name for a disease, is that it is simply based on a list of symptoms, the same symptoms found in the U.S. Government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccines, and there is no laboratory test to diagnose "Long COVID." If health insurance companies were forced to start covering the costs of treating all these cases of "Long COVID," it would almost certainly mean the financial collapse of the insurance industry.

“Long COVID” is the Term Now Used to Cover Up COVID Vaccine Injuries as Health Insurance Companies Face Financial Collapse

Last month (September, 2022) we reported how Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is the new term apparently being used to cover up deaths due to the COVID-19 vaccines, and that in many places around the world it is now the #1 cause of death. But what about those who suffer injuries and disabilities following COVID-19 vaccines, but do not die? Health statistics clearly show that there has been a significant increase in disabilities which has resulted in many people no longer being able to work, and Edward Dowd has been a leader in the U.S. publishing health and life insurance statistics that bear this out. The CDC had to deal with these health statistics, and they have apparently chosen to use the term "Long COVID" to explain data that they published this week showing that this affects 24 million adults in the U.S., including between 2 million and 4 million—or about 2% of the workforce—who are not working because of it. There are currently no diagnostic tests that can identify "Long COVID," which of course presents major problems for the Health Insurance industry, as well as applying for Social Security disability benefits. Similar to how "SADS" is killing young, formerly healthy people, the CDC data shows similar results for Long COVID for younger age groups: "14.9% of people 18 to 29 years old have experienced long COVID, and 16% of those 30 to 39 years old have had it." Since there are no diagnostic tests to identify Long COVID, how is the CDC identifying it? By symptoms. There is a long list which was published in a Fierce Healthcare article this week, and all of these symptoms can be found in abundance in the U.S. Government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccines. So is the CDC considering COVID-19 vaccines as a possible cause of "Long COVID"? From the Fierce Healthcare article: "Kavanagh has long been a proponent of the necessity for vaccines, but the CDC data doesn’t have a vaccination status category. Vaccination status became something of a lightning rod during COVID-19 surges, with those who followed the CDC guidelines noting that they often had to pay (in a sense) for the emergency care and/or hospitalizations of those that hadn’t. Being vaccinated helps guard against getting long COVID, according to the CDC." Let that sink in America. The CDC wants the public to believe that "being vaccinated helps guard against getting long COVID." And when hospitalizations were increasing in 2021 when the vaccines were being rolled out, with about 80% of the American public taking at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine according to the CDC, it was the unvaccinated who were being blamed for increased hospitalization rates. If both of these statements were actually true, would it not be in the best interest of the CDC to track COVID-19 vaccination status?? They certainly have the data to do so. So why are they not tracking COVID-19 vaccination status and publishing the data?