Dr. Julie Gerberding was the director of the CDC from 2002 to 2009 and approved the Gardasil Vaccine before resigning and going to work for Merck, the pharmaceutical company who manufactures Gardasil.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

As we have previously reported here at Health Impact News, former CDC director, Dr. Julie Gerberding, has been referred to as either “one of the most evil people in medicine today” or the Healthcare Businesswomen’s “Woman of the Year.”

See:

Former CDC Director that Approved Gardasil Vaccine and Became Head of Merck’s Vaccine Division Named “Woman of the Year”

A crowd gathered in New York City to protest the Healthcare Businesswomen’s award, and Dr. Brian Hooker, who has spent many years of his life uncovering corruption at the CDC, addressed the crowd.

He talked about the conversations he had with CDC whistleblower, Dr. Willliam Thompson, who worked with Dr. Gerberding during the years she served as the Director of the CDC, when the Gardasil vaccine was approved.

More on Dr. Brian Hooker

Note: Due to some portions of the audio not being clear, Dr. Hooker has provided us with his lecture notes, which we included here.

Gerberding Protest Speech

by Dr. Brian Hooker

Julie Louise Gerberding joined the CDC in 1998 and was quickly promoted to the post of Director, where she served from 2002 to January 2009.

After waiting the minimum time required by law to take an industry post, Gerberding was appointed the President of Merck’s vaccine division in late 2009.

As a result of her signing with Merck, Gerberding was awarded many millions of dollars in stock options. When she sold over 38,000 in shares in 2015, she made $2.3 million dollars. She reportedly still owns just less than $2 million dollars in Merck stock.

Gerberding was paid liberally by Merck for her activities as CDC director, where she repeatedly hid the relationship between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.

When Gerberding took the helm at CDC, the Immunization Safety Office was thick in two controversies surrounding thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism, as well as the MMR vaccine and autism.

Thomas Verstraeten had started studying thimerosal and autism in 1999 and his coworkers were working hard to dilute a strong, statistically-significant relationship, which had been elucidated as early as November, 1999.

By 2002, when Gerberding had been appointed director, Verstraeten had already left the CDC for a position at GlaxoSmithKline and had left his research in the hands of his bosses at the ISO who were “cooking the books” furiously to “get rid” of the relationship between thimerosal exposure and autism.

This included ISO chief Dr. Robert Chen, Dr. Frank Destefano, Dr. Robert Davis, and Phillip Rhoades who used every statistical “trick” in the book to abolish this strong, rather obvious relationship.

To dilute the relationship, children were added to the study who were too young to get an autism diagnosis. When clinics would show “clusters” of autism diagnoses, they were eliminated from the analysis, and datasets were parsed into smaller and smaller groups in order to lose statistical “power.”

CDC Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson

Thompson tried to warn Gerberding of the “African American” effect for the timing of the MMR vaccine and autism. He had tried to work with his supervisors, Dr. Frank Destefano and Dr. Coleen Boyle, and they told him to bury the results in a large blue waste bin.

Convening of the 2004 IOM ISR Meeting “Vaccines and Autism” – in late 2003, with the Verstraeten et al. 2003 study published and the Thompson (Destefano) MMR study “on the rails” to be published, the CDC via Gerberding contacted the IOM to hold an unscheduled, last-minute meeting of the Immunization Safety Review Committee in order to put the nail in the coffin of the vaccine-autism hypothesis.

Although there existed then, and still exists today, huge holes in vaccine safety science, the meeting was deceptively titled, “Vaccines and Autism.”

Dr. Dave Weldon, a U.S. congressman from Florida, knew that this would be a rush to judgment in order to absolve vaccines from the autism epidemic and told Gerberding this directly in a January 2004 letter.

In a 2/3/04 phone call, Gerberding told a bold and blatant lie to Dr. Weldon that this would not be a rush to judgment but instead there would be no attempt to “draw any conclusions.”

Again, she lied through her teeth. This meeting was a set-up to draw the conclusion that “vaccines don’t cause autism” and to be used to deny claims of over 5,000 petitioners in the NVICP each who watched their wonderful, special children regress into the world of autism, soon after receiving their infant vaccines.

The lie was so deep that in fact, the final report from this IOM meeting, issued in May 2004, stated that no further research should be done regarding the vaccine-autism hypothesis.

I’m sorry, but if you lost in vaccine court, blame Gerberding. She was the one who crafted this plot, and she deserves no less than jail time.

Thorsen Affair

During Gerberding’s tenure, taxpayer dollars were funneled to Dr. Poul Thorsen, a Danish researcher who was in residence at CDC during the early 2000s and left to form NANEA (the North Atlantic Neuroepidemiological Alliance at Aarhus University in Denmark.

Over 10 million dollars of your and my money was sent to Denmark to take the focus on autism away from vaccines in order to produce junk science placing the blame of autism on old parents, bad genes, fat moms, and grandparents who smoke.

The strategy under Gerberding was clear, indemnify vaccines at all costs and punish the parents of the very children who are the most vulnerable, were injured by vaccines, and need the most help!

Of course, the whole time that Thorsen was receiving money from the CDC, he was having an affair with his direct supervisor at the CDC, Dr. Diana Schendel.

This was apparent to parties both inside and outside the CDC, where Thorsen and Schendel would plan lavish retreats together, fueled by CDC funds.

Thorsen indeed played fast-and-loose with the funds, given the nepotistic relationship with the very CDC official who was approving those funds.

Under the noses of CDC leadership, Thorsen devised a scheme using phony invoices and accounts he set up at the CDC Federal Credit Union. By making deposits into these accounts, Thorsen was able to embezzle and steal over $1 million of funds for autism research.

With this stolen blood money, Thorsen bought a car, a house in Atlanta, and a Harley Davidson motorcycle, again, right in plain sight of his CDC superiors, while carrying on an elicit relationship with his boss.

Officials at CDC knew this was going on, and despite the fact that Thorsen was indicted by the U.S Attorney in Atlanta on 22 counts of wire fraud and money laundering in 2011, maintained a relationship with him until 2013.

Thorsen is living in plain sight in Denmark today, and the U.S. won’t extradite him because he committed fraud to cover up the relationship between vaccines and autism.

Yes, the CDC and the DHHS know that Thorsen will “sing like a bird” about this fraud, and his bosses and the powers-that-be never want that to see the light of day.

In two Danish studies, one on thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism and the other regarding the MMR vaccine and autism, Thorsen cooked the books to obviate significant relationships seen in both cases.

In the Madsen et al. 2003 thimerosal paper, the premise was that Denmark autism prevalence rates went up despite the phase out of thimerosal in vaccines in 1992.

He cooked the books here to switch the counting method to exclude outpatient diagnoses prior to 1993 and include outpatient diagnoses in 1993 and thereafter. Since outpatient diagnoses of autism outnumber hospital-diagnosed autism by 13-fold, this caused a huge artificial increase in autism cases.

Despite this cheat, Thorsen, with his buddy Dr. Coleen Boyle (his lover Schendel’s boss), still had to omit data from 1999 to 2001 that showed a clear downward trend in autism prevalence in the three age groups studied. Much later, in a paper by Schendel, in 2013, it was very clearly shown that autism spectrum disorder prevalence in Denmark dropped by 33% in the 10-year period after thimerosal was phased out of infant vaccines.

Further, in a paper on the MMR vaccine and autism prevalence in Denmark, Thorsen changed the numbers of autism cases to those children receiving the MMR vaccine in order to obviate the significance of the relationship between MMR uptake and autism.

Thorsen did this using data from which he had no permission to access. Yes, Thorsen had never bothered to gain ethical approval for this study, which is in the New England Journal of Medicine and stands as a “strong” piece of evidence against the vaccine-autism hypothesis today.

This was all done on Gerberding’s watch as she worked with her minions to construct a “house of cards” which consists of the fatally-flawed vaccination program used to poison children all over the U.S. today.

HPV Vaccine Controversy

The HPV vaccine was never tested against a true placebo, instead it was tested against a placebo containing toxic aluminum hydroxyphospate sulfate.

Also the follow-up period in the safety trial was only 15 days. That means that any adverse event happening after 15 days was never reported!

Gerberding oversaw the addition of the HPV vaccine (Merck’s Gardasil) in 2007 and then accepted a position at Merck in late 2009.

No conflict of interest there! Gardasil has been called “the most dangerous vaccine in history” and has led to over 53,000 injuries (as reported in VAERS) and 383 deaths.

It should be noted that the adverse events in VAERS are woefully underreported. Gardasil has been linked to premature menopause in girls as young as 16.

In the clinical trial alone, 2.3% of the subject receiving Gardasil were later diagnosed with an autoimmune disorder. Of course, this was never compared to a true placebo as the control group got aluminum adjuvant.

After Gardasil was licensed and three doses recommended for 11 to 12-year-old girls and young women, there were thousands of reports of sudden collapse with unconsciousness within 24 hours: seizures; muscle pain and weakness; disabling fatigue; Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS); facial paralysis; brain inflammation; rheumatoid arthritis; lupus; blood clots; optic neuritis; multiple sclerosis; strokes; heart and other serious health problems, including death, following receipt of Gardasil vaccine.

Using the MedAlerts search engine, as of October 31, 2017, there have been more than 55,239 reports of HPV vaccine reactions, hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths following HPV vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including 397 related deaths, 4,949 hospitalizations, and 2,397 related disabilities. Over 35% of those serious HPV vaccine-related adverse events occurred in children and teens 12-17 years of age.

Gerberding has Blood on Her Hands

Gerberding is culpable in the autism crisis (she has blood on her hands), and daily she is responsible for the millions of children and adults (in the U.S. and worldwide) who will suffer from some type of vaccine injury.

I’ll have to admit, I don’t normally do protests, but this injustice hit me at my core.

We have nicknamed Gerberding “Cruella” after Cruella DeVil from 101 Dalmatians (due to the obvious likeness; what is with that big white forelock, anyway).

But I would contest, why, with this comparison, would we be so cruel to this Disney character? Sure, she wanted to kill puppies, and that’s bad.

How much worse is a generation killed, stolen from, and destroyed by the woman who saw her charge at the CDC with the dollar signs of her future position in large pharma.

How much is a soul worth? Evidently, it is worth $4 million in stock options from Merck!

Order Here!

Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.

In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.

One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.