Last week we published an article showing the evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated children, and we featured several video testimonies from families where previously pro-vaccine parents changed their minds after viewing vaccine injuries in their children, and subsequently did not vaccinate future children, creating the perfect home laboratory to observe the difference between vaccinated children and unvaccinated children. Last week, a new study was published in the journal SAGE Open Medicine titled: "Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders." It was authored by Dr. Brian Hooker and Neil Miller. Dr. Hooker is well-known to readers of Health Impact News, as we have featured his work many times over the years. He has done more than perhaps anyone in the U.S. to expose fraud at the CDC in regards to their vaccine studies that supposedly prove vaccines are not linked to autism.
"Vaccines are safe and effective." "The science on vaccines is settled." These statements are the official dogma of Big Pharma and the U.S Government health agencies, and anyone in the corporate media who has ever tried to challenge these statements of belief has been quickly silenced. Yet even to the casual reader with no invested interest in the topic, it would seem fairly obvious that these are statements of faith, and not scientific statements. How can a pharmaceutical product always be "safe and effective" for everyone? And how can the science on anything, let alone vaccines, ever be "settled"? And yet these beliefs are put forward as facts, and all dissenters, or even just those who dare to ask a question, are censored or labeled as "anti-vaxxers" or "quacks" if they happen to be a doctor or scientist. The fact that vaccines can and do cause injury and death in some situations is not even a debatable subject, as the U.S. Vaccine Court has paid out $BILLIONS in damages since the passage of the National Vaccine Compensation program passed in the 1980s, giving legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies who make vaccines, and can no longer be sued if a vaccine causes an injury or death. But even though this is public knowledge, and even though Health Impact News publishes the quarterly reports published by the Department of Justice listing settlements for vaccine injuries and deaths, we are censored and labeled as publishing "Fake News" by the Big Tech giants, like Facebook and Google. This is clearly information they do not want the public to know. But what about the second part of the belief that "vaccines are safe and effective?" Since we know that vaccines are not totally safe, and that this information is censored, it is totally appropriate to then ask the question: Are vaccines actually effective? What about overall health of children following the CDC vaccine schedule, as compared to children who do not receive all the vaccines in the CDC vaccine schedule? This is the one study that would solve this issue once and for all, but the U.S. government refuses to conduct such a trial, claiming it would be "unethical" to withhold vaccines from children. Those outside of the government who have tried to conduct such studies have been attacked and censored. We have featured doctors on Health Impact News over the years who have said that unvaccinated children in their practice are healthier than vaccinated children, and these doctors take great courage to speak publicly, because they are labeled as "quacks" and often face losing their medical license to practice for revealing this. Perhaps the most convincing evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated children, is from parents who observe both in their homes on a daily basis. These are mostly former pro-vaccine parents who never doubted vaccinations until they saw the effects of vaccines in their own children, and then decided to not vaccinate other children born later based on their experience with vaccines. These are actually very good "laboratories" because children in the same home experience much the same things in their environment, and any major differences in their health will be much more obvious. VAXXED II film producer Polly Tommey has done the world a great favor by interviewing many of these families during their bus tour, and here are a few of them.
Part six in our series of studies comparing health outcomes among vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations. Once again, chronic illness plagues the vaccinated cohorts. CDC and Pharma make great efforts to block researchers from performing these studies and to prevent the journals from publishing them. Nonetheless, independent scientists have persisted and their reports have evaded the censors. Public health advocates willing to search can find them in quiet abundance among the peer-reviewed literature on Pubmed.
Hello, my name is Joy Garner. I am the founder of The Control Group, thecontrolgroup.org. We are now conducting the largest-ever epidemiological health study of unvaccinated people in preparation for a federal lawsuit to end all vaccine mandates Nationwide. We are NOT asking for money. We need ACTION. Even a few minutes of time WILL make a huge difference. UNvaccinated people are the EVIDENCE big pharma is desperately trying to eliminate with their vaccine mandates, SO THAT the cause can never been fully proven. We MUST collect as much evidence as possible while we still can. Once they criminalize unvaccinated people, everyone will go into hiding and we will not be ABLE to collect this data, not even with "anonymous" participants. Our surveys CAN currently be completed anonymously. We already have plenty of "sample" witnesses who are looking forward to testifying about the good health of their unvaccinated children. But this matter is URGENT. If we wait, NOBODY will be willing to testify or even be willing to fill out an anonymous health survey, for fear of potential prosecution.
The first-ever study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated American children (and a subset study) published two weeks ago in the peer-reviewed Journal of Translational Science have reappeared online after briefly disappearing while under fire from a small band of Skeptics and the staff at Retraction Watch, an organization that reports Science retraction news. Snopes, the fact-checking website, is still misreporting that the study has been retracted, even while it sits, published, in the science journal’s pages. It is a troubling saga unfolding in the scientific publishing world, and it is worth paying attention to because it’s revealing of powerful forces in that realm that are trying to censor scientific research and to shield important data from public viewing.